matrapas.eu

What is GS1 Digital Link and do I need it for the digital product passport?

A technical standard for the QR code, not a separate legal obligation

GS1 Digital Link is a way to structure a barcode or QR code so that it can do two things at once: identify a product (the way a regular barcode already does) and immediately direct to a web page with more information about that product. The code then contains, for example, the GTIN number of the mattress, embedded in a regular internet link. A checkout scanner reads the code as usual, but a consumer or buyer who scans the same code with a phone arrives at a web page — in this case the digital product passport. GS1 Digital Link is not itself an obligation under the ESPR; it is an existing, globally used standard that aligns well with what the ESPR requires of the product passport: a unique identification (Article 12) that is accessible via a machine-readable carrier (Article 11).

For whom this is relevant, and for what it is not

This topic is particularly relevant for manufacturers and importers who have the QR code created on the mattress or packaging, and parties who already work with GS1 numbering for logistics or retail (GTIN, GLN). For bed specialist retailers and hotel purchasing, it is mainly relevant as background: they scan the code, but do not need to set anything up themselves. GS1 Digital Link concerns the form of the data carrier — how the code is structured so that it points to the right place. It says nothing about the content of the passport: which data must be included in it, who supplies them and how long they are kept, follows from other parts of the ESPR and from the product-specific delegated act for mattresses. Also, GS1 Digital Link is not the only way to comply with Article 11; the ESPR text available here does not prescribe a specific technical standard. GS1 Digital Link is currently the standard most commonly used in practice for this type of application, among other things because many manufacturers already use GS1 numbers for their existing barcodes.

When this becomes concrete is still uncertain

The date on which a product passport for mattresses becomes mandatory is not yet fixed. That date will only become clear once the delegated act for mattresses has been published; at present this has not yet happened. What is fixed is the framework from the ESPR itself: Article 11 determines that the passport must be accessible via a data carrier and Article 12 that a unique identification code must be linked to the product. The precise technical implementation — what type of data carrier, what syntax, and whether a standard such as GS1 Digital Link is mentioned by name — is something that belongs in the implementation details of the delegated act, and these do not yet exist for mattresses. Until then, there is room to align with an existing, widely supported standard without there being a legal obligation to use that specific standard.

How this works in practice for a manufacturer

If you're already thinking about the QR code on a mattress, you usually start with the question of whether GS1 numbers are already in use for logistics or sales — a GTIN on the packaging, for example. If so, the step to GS1 Digital Link is relatively small: the same number is then processed in a link structure that points to the passport instead of only to a product description. If there is no GS1 numbering in use yet, the first step is usually to request a GS1 company prefix from GS1 Nederland (or the local GS1 organisation), after which GTINs can be issued per mattress model or variant. This is followed by the choice of what exactly is behind the link: it is the passport itself, with the data that the manufacturer provides. Matrapas.eu handles the formatting of the passport and the QR data carrier in that final step, but the GTIN and any GS1 registration remain with the manufacturer or importer themselves, because they may already have a basis for this from existing sales channels.

Based on: Article 11 and Article 12 of the ESPR

Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 governs the technical design and operation of the digital product passport, including the requirement that the passport must be accessible via a data carrier. Article 12 governs the unique identification code that is linked to the product. Both articles describe what the passport must be capable of, not with which specific technical standard that is realised. GS1 Digital Link is an existing standard that meets those two requirements, but the articles themselves do not mention that standard by name.

What to do

If you are already producing or importing mattresses and are already working with GS1 numbering, you can get that basis in order now: a valid GTIN per model is the first building block for a QR code that can later point to a passport. If you don't have that yet, you can include the application for a GS1 company prefix as a preparation step, without having to wait for the publication of the delegated act for mattresses. For the content of the passport itself and the exact mandatory data, the official text of the ESPR and the delegated act to be published remain the source to follow.

Where this is based on

The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you concretely must do

What is expected of you

GS1 Digital Link is not a legal obligation in itself, but a technical standard that aligns with what Article 11 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) requires: a data portal that is accessible via a carrier such as a QR code and that leads to the correct product information. GS1 Digital Link is a way to build the link between an identification code and a web address so that one QR code can serve multiple purposes at the same time.

A QR code that can point to multiple locations

A standard QR code usually contains one fixed web address. GS1 Digital Link attaches the product identification (such as a GTIN) to a URL structure, so that one scan can lead both to the product passport and to other information, such as a warranty page or ordering information, depending on who scans and with which application. For a mattress manufacturer with 10 to 100 employees, this mainly means making a choice in advance: do you use the existing GS1 numbers that are already on the packaging or label, or do you build a separate, isolated structure for the passport only. Those already working with GS1 barcodes for logistics or retail have a head start, because the identification code is usually already in place.

Aligning with the unique identification code that the passport already requires

Article 12 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) requires a unique identification code per product or product model. GS1 Digital Link is one way to technically embed that code in the QR carrier. For a company, this means that the choice for GS1 Digital Link is not separate from the question how each product receives a unique identification code — the two coincide in practice. Those already holding a GS1 membership and assigning GTINs can often extend that structure to the passport without setting up a parallel system.

Ensuring that the link actually leads to the data portal

The technical standard regulates the form of the code, not automatically the content behind it. There still needs to be a functioning data portal that displays the information that Article 11 requires. For a company, this means that choosing GS1 Digital Link as a coding standard is only one step; the question what software is needed to create the passport and how that is linked to the carrier, remains to be addressed.

Maintaining consistency between the physical carrier and underlying data

When a mattress passes through multiple links via an importer, wholesaler or own factory, the code on the QR sticker must match the code recorded in the passport and possibly in the register. GS1 Digital Link makes this technically more manageable because the identification code is structured in the URL, but it does not prevent internal errors from occurring if different departments work with different numbering sequences.

Where things go wrong in practice

A manufacturer opts for its own, randomly generated URL per mattress model instead of a GS1 Digital Link structure, and later discovers that this is difficult to scale once a wholesale partner wants to resell the same mattresses under its own item number.

A company has been using GTINs for years in its logistical barcode, but the department setting up the product passport is unaware of this and starts a completely new, unrelated coding sequence — resulting in two parallel systems that do not align with each other.

An importer has the QR code printed by a supplier without checking whether the underlying link actually points to an active data portal; the code scans, but displays an empty or expired page.

A mattress manufacturer incorrectly assumes that GS1 Digital Link is mandatory for every digital product passport and spends time setting up a GS1 membership when their own situation could have worked with a simpler, non-GS1-based link.

For mattresses that differ per unit, such as bespoke mattressesthe fixed GS1 Digital Link structure is sometimes applied too rigidly, whereas each copy actually needs its own unique code.

What you can record

  • An overview of existing GS1 memberships, GTIN ranges and who within the company issues and manages these numbers.
  • A decision, formally documented, on whether the product passport aligns with the existing GS1 structure or not, and the reason for that choice.
  • A test report documenting that the QR code on the product actually leads to the correct, active data portal — relevant in combination with the question how the QR code is applied to the mattress.
  • Agreements with the software supplier or hosting party on how the GS1 Digital Link structure (if used) is generated and maintained, also if the product passport is linked to an ERP or inventory system.
  • A procedure for what happens when a GTIN or product identification changes, so that the link between code and passport does not break silently.
  • An internal document stating which department is responsible for keeping the link between physical carrier and digital content up to date, including a check that addresses the question what to do if the QR code is damaged or comes loose.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.