what should I do if the label with the QR code comes loose or wears out
If the label comes off, the passport usually still exists
A QR code on a mattress is not the product passport itself, but only the means of access to it. The passport is a dataset that is hosted separately and remains available for ten years; the label on the mattress is merely the data carrier by which someone can access it with a scan. If that label comes off, discolours or becomes unreadable through wear, the underlying data does not disappear — only the physical access on that particular unit is lost. That is a practical problem (a customer, shop assistant or hotel buyer can no longer scan the data), but not a legal problem in the sense that the passport is "lost".
Who this applies to, and where the boundary lies
This topic concerns the physical data carrier on the product: the label, hang tag or stitched attachment with the QR code affixed to the mattress itself. It does not concern the question of how that code gets there in the first place — that is a separate choice that varies per production line and sales channel, and which is covered more extensively in how the QR code for the product passport gets onto the mattress. It also does not concern the question of whether the same QR can already be affixed to existing stock before sale; that is a different scenario, covered in applying a QR code to already manufactured mattresses. And it does not concern the passport as a dataset — the question of how long that data remains in existence is separate from the question of whether the label goes along with it, and is explained separately in how long the product passport remains available.
There is no fixed date yet, but a clear point of departure
Exactly when the obligation to maintain a digital product passport with data carrier will apply to mattresses is not yet established: this will follow from a delegated act that has yet to be published. Until that time, nothing changes in existing mattress sales as a result of this regulation. What is already established, regardless of the precise date, is the principle set out in Article 11 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781): the data carrier on the product must be durable, legible and able to withstand use for the period of use appropriate to the product type. For a mattress — a product that is in use for many years, withstands washed covers and is sometimes moved — this is a real point of attention when choosing the label, and not something that only becomes apparent afterwards.
What to do if the label on a mattress is unreadable
The first step is to check whether the mattress can still be identified by another route than the QR code itself, such as a printed serial number, a product code on a separate label, or records with the manufacturer or seller. The passport itself is linked to the unique identification code of the product, not to the label — see also how each product receives a unique identification code. Once that code is known, the passport can in most cases still be looked up, for example via the register in which passports are registered (see the European register of digital product passports).
The second step, for a manufacturer, importer or seller who encounters this problem on multiple products, is to assess whether a replacement label with the same link can be re-applied. Because the data carrier is linked to the identification code and not to a physical piece of paper, a new label with the same QR content is in practice often possible to make and apply, as long as the underlying link between product and passport has been maintained.
The third step is for the longer term: when choosing the label in advance, take into account the environment in which the mattress will end up. A mattress that is used intensively and washed in a hotel places different demands on a label than a mattress that remains at home under a cover. Material choice, method of attachment and position of the label are therefore practical choices that reduce the risk of loss or unreadability beforehand, rather than having to repair it afterwards.
For those who manage the passport themselves via their own inventory or ERP system, it is also worthwhile to check whether the link between product code and passport is properly documented there, so that a replacement label does not have to be built from scratch — more on this at linking the product passport to an ERP or inventory system.
The substantiation: articles 11, 16, 17 and 13 of the ESPR
Article 11 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) sets the technical requirements for the data carrier, including durability and readability during the relevant period of use of the product. Article 16 governs the requirements for labels in connection with the digital product passport, and article 17 prohibits the use of counterfeit or misleading labels — relevant as soon as a replacement label is made, because that label must maintain a faithful link with the registered passport. Article 10 describes the substantive requirements that the passport as a dataset must meet, regardless of the physical carrier. Article 13 governs the register in which passports and their identification codes can be found, which forms the basis for tracing a product even without a readable label.
What to do now
Those who already produce or sell mattresses with a QR label are well advised to record the identification code of each product separately from the label, so that a damaged or loose label does not become a dead end. For those who still have to choose which label and which attachment it will be, it is wise to test that choice against the expected service life and use of the mattress, rather than discovering afterwards that the label does not survive the first wash.
Where this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 11 (technical design and operation of the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 16 (labels) and Article 17 (imitated labels)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 10 (requirements for the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 13 (register of digital product passports)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you concretely must do
What is expected of you
A data carrier that can withstand normal use
Article 11 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) sets requirements for the technical design and operation of the digital product passport, and the data carrier falls under this — for a mattress usually a QR code on a label or sewn edge. The rationale behind this article is that the link between product and passport continues to work as long as the product is in use, not just on the day of sale. For a manufacturer with 10 to 100 employees, this means that the choice of label, its location and material is not a minor matter to be left to the packaging department, but a choice that aligns with how long a mattress lasts and what happens to the label during those years: washing the cover, lying on the mat for years, moves.
A label that is recognisable and not misleading
Article 16 deals with labels and article 17 with counterfeit labels. These articles mainly regulate how a label may look and that no labels may circulate that counterfeit a genuine product passport label without a valid passport behind it. In practice, this means that a replacement label — for example one that a shop or service later attaches — must contain the same QR code and the same link to the passport as the original, and not a new, self-made label that looks the same.
Data that remains findable even without the physical label
Article 10 describes the requirements for the digital product passport itself, independent of the data carrier. The passport is the dataset that belongs to a particular product; the QR code is merely the gateway to it. For a company, this means that it is wise not to rely solely on the label as the only access to the data. How each product receives a unique identification code is also what determines whether the passport can be found in another way, for example via the order number or type number, without the QR code itself having to be scanned.
Registration that is separate from the label
Article 13 governs the register of digital product passports. That register contains a basic set of information about each passport issued, regardless of whether the label on the physical product is still readable. What exactly goes into this register and who fills it in is described on the page about the register of digital product passports. For the question "what if the label comes off" this register is relevant because it is a second access point: even without a functioning QR code on the product, the product passport exists and can be found there.
Where things go wrong in practice
The label has been sewn in the wrong place. A label on the underside of the mattress, where the mattress rests on a bed base, becomes unreadable faster due to friction and moisture than a label on the side. This seems to be a production choice without consequences, but becomes a practical problem after a few years of use for the end user who wants to consult the product passport.
There is no second means of access to the product passport. When the QR code is the only way to access the data, and the label disappears, there is no alternative. Companies that additionally link a unique identification code to their order system retain a fallback option.
With bespoke mattresses the label is forgotten. With custom work, attention often shifts to dimensions and material choice, and applying a correct, unique label becomes secondary. How this can be done differently in practice is described at how the product passport works for made-to-measure mattresses.
A shop or importer sticks on a new label themselves. If a mattress is damaged during transport or storage and the label is lost, there is a temptation to print something yourself and stick it on. Without the correct link to the existing product passport, this creates a label that looks like a product passport label, but is substantively separate from it — precisely the situation that Article 17 addresses.
Stock that was already produced before the label issue was resolved. Manufacturers who have mattresses in stock from before the product passport was introduced face the question of whether and how a label can be applied afterwards. This is worked out on the page about applying a QR code to existing stock.
What you can record
- A choice of label type and fastening method, with a justification for why this location and this material are suitable for the expected useful life of the mattress.
- A procedure for replacement labels, stating who may apply a new label (manufacturer, importer, shop), and how it is ensured that this label refers to the same product passport as the original — relevant in light of Article 17 on counterfeit labels.
- An overview of the unique identification codes per product or production batch, so that a product passport can also be found without scanning the QR code. See about this how each product receives a unique identification code.
- A note on the link with your own company system, so that when a complaint is made about an unreadable label, it is quickly clear which product passport belongs to which mattress. More information about this is at linking the product passport to an ERP or inventory system.
- A saved version of the registered product passport, independent of the physical label, so that the data can still be requested after years. Matrapas.eu keeps this for subscribers as part of the hosting.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, reviewed by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not correct? Let us know — corrections are given priority.