What can I do now while the rules are not yet final?
Start collecting data and mapping the supply chain now
What a mattress manufacturer, importer or specialist retailer can do right now is to get the basics in order: collect material data, map out suppliers and record what is already known about the composition, origin and processing of a mattress. This work will be needed as soon as the delegated act for mattresses is published, and it is already useful now — for your own quality assurance, for conversations with buyers who ask about sustainability, and to avoid time pressure later if the obligation does get a fixed date. The ESPR itself (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is already in force; it is the product-specific implementation for mattresses that is still to come. That sequence — framework regulation first, product rules later via a separate decision — is precisely why "not yet mandatory" is not the same as "nothing to do yet".
For whom this is relevant, and for what it is not
This is relevant for parties that place mattresses on the EU market or procure them: manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, specialist bed retailers and hotel purchasing departments. It concerns preparation for an obligation that is still to be established, not an obligation that already applies today. There is therefore no legal obligation to maintain a digital product passport for mattresses yet, and no one can say with certainty right now which data will be mandatory or from which point in time. Nor does this concern other product groups — the ESPR works with a prioritisation process per product category, and mattresses are going through that process at their own pace, independently of, for example, textiles or electronics. And it is not about mattresses that have already been sold: preparation is aimed at what comes to market after the rules take effect, not at documenting existing stock with retroactive effect.
The date is not yet fixed
There is no fixed date on which the digital product passport for mattresses becomes mandatory. What is certain is the framework around it: the ESPR describes in Article 18 how the European Commission is working on a prioritisation and scheduling of product categories for which product-specific requirements are to be established. Mattresses are part of that process, but the product-specific delegated act — the decision that really determines what must be in the passport and from when — has not yet been published. Until that publication there is no concrete obligation for mattresses, and any date circulating here and there is an expectation, not an established fact. Once the delegated act is published, the date is fixed and this page will be updated.
What this concretely means, in the order to address it
The first step is internal: create an overview of the materials and components in a mattress, including origin and suppliers. This overview often already exists in part in purchasing administration or quality files, but rarely in a way that is ready for a passport — it is worthwhile to consolidate it now. The second step is to organize the supplier chain: determine which supplier can provide which information, and where data is currently missing or scattered. Article 38 of the ESPR describes that actors in the supply chain can be required to provide information necessary for compliance with product-specific requirements; it is therefore wise to know now who in the chain has which data, rather than discovering that only when a deadline is already running. The third step is to assign internally who will be responsible for compiling and keeping passport data up to date — at a manufacturer usually quality or compliance, at an importer often purchasing. The fourth step is to monitor the progress of the ESPR work plan, so that it is known when mattresses as a product category come up specifically. The fifth step, finally, is to check early on how data will need to be made available digitally — via a data carrier such as a QR code — so that this does not come as a separate action afterwards, but aligns with the product data already built up.
The legal basis: Article 18 and Article 38 of the ESPR
The fact that there is no fixed obligation yet follows from Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781: this article regulates the process of prioritization and planning by which the Commission determines for which product groups, in which order, product-specific requirements are developed through delegated acts. That it makes sense for mattresses to prepare for this, even without a fixed date, follows from Article 38: this article establishes that actors in the supply chain can be required to provide information necessary to comply with the requirements, which means that the data flow through the chain will in any case become part of how the passport will be filled in.
Anyone who wants to start now begins by collecting material and supplier data internally and mapping their own chain — that work is never wasted, regardless of when the delegated act for mattresses is published.
Where this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 18 (prioritisation and planning)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you concretely must do
What is expected of you
The delegated act for mattresses does not yet exist. This does not mean there is nothing to do. The ESPR itself is already fixed, and part of the obligations that will fall under it can already be recognized in the way the regulation is structured. Whoever acts on this now will be better positioned once the date is set.
Know where your product will fall
Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes how the European Commission prioritizes product groups and draws up a work plan. Mattresses are on that work plan, but the precise requirements will only come with the delegated act. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this mainly means: keeping track of which product group classification and which scope are proposed, so there is no surprise about which mattresses do or do not count. Those who are unsure whether an assortment falls under it can find the background in Does the digital product passport apply to my mattresses?.
Determine who in the chain provides which information
Article 38 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes the requirements for actors in the supply chain: who must supply and pass on which data. This article is not mattress-specific, but the principle behind it — that product information must remain traceable throughout the chain — is already usable as a guideline. A manufacturer or importer can now already inventory which data on materials, composition and origin are available internally, and which still need to be obtained from suppliers. This work is necessary with or without a definitive date, and saves time once the requirements become concrete.
Get basic documentation in order
Even without established requirements, it is practical to already document what is known about a mattress: materials, filling, origin, any test results, warranty and maintenance information. This is largely the same information that will later go into a passport. A good overview of this largely determines what a product passport for mattresses costs, because most of that work lies in collecting and organizing data, not in the technology of the QR code itself.
Where things go wrong in practice
Wait until the date is known. Some companies postpone all preparation until "it is certain". The result is that when the delegated act is published, all preparatory inventory still has to happen within a shorter time than if it had already been started.
No visibility into your own supply chain. An importer who takes mattresses from a manufacturer outside the EU often only discovers when a specific request is made that material data are incomplete or not up to date. Obtaining data afterwards from a supplier who no longer supplies or no longer exists is considerably more difficult than maintaining this systematically now.
Staff that do not know what is happening. Shop staff sometimes already get questions from customers about sustainability and origin, while internally there is still no agreement on what can and cannot be said. This leads to inconsistent or incorrect answers at the counter. See what you answer when a customer asks in the shop about the product passport en how you inform your shop staff about the digital product passport.
Inventory decisions without taking the future into account. Bed specialist retailers and manufacturers sometimes make purchasing or markdown decisions without considering what happens to existing stock once new rules come into force. This applies to discontinued collections just as much as to returns after trial sleeping; see what you do with stock that is already there when the rules come into force en what you do with mattresses that are returned after trial sleeping.
No steps taken in the process. Companies that think introducing a product passport is a matter of a few weeks once the date is set often underestimate the number of steps. An overview of these steps is in how you implement the product passport for mattresses step by step.
What you can record
- An overview per mattress model of known materials, composition and origin, even if this is not yet complete.
- A list of suppliers per model, with contact person and last known data on material information.
- Internal agreements on who within the company is responsible for monitoring developments regarding the delegated act for mattresses.
- Basic instruction for retail staff on what can and cannot be said with certainty at this point about the digital product passport.
- Test results, warranty conditions and maintenance advice that already exist, bundled per product line.
- A note on expiring or to be reviewed contracts with suppliers, so that data exchange on materials becomes a fixed part of it.
None of this work is mandatory as long as the delegated act has not been published. It is work that will be necessary in any case, and doing it now saves time when the requirements are established.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.