What happens if I don't have a digital product passport for my mattresses?
No mandatory passport yet, but consequences later
At present, there are no consequences if a mattress manufacturer does not have a digital product passport: for mattresses, this obligation does not yet exist. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is the framework within which the European Commission establishes delegated acts for each product group that determine which products require a passport, with which data, and from when. For mattresses, this act does not yet exist. Once it does and enters into force, the picture will change: products that fall within the scope and are placed on the market without a passport then run the risk that a market surveillance authority will intervene on the basis of the market surveillance regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1020).
For whom this applies, and for whom it does not
This topic concerns manufacturers and importers of mattresses who place products on the EU market — they will be the ones required to have the passport compiled and keep it available. A bedding specialist shop that resells mattresses that are already provided with a valid passport generally has no separate obligation to compile anything itself; it is selling a product that already complies. Hotel procurement and other business buyers are in a similar position: they are the buyer, not the party required to provide the passport. What this topic also does not regulate is an obligation for the end user (the consumer or hotel guest) — they will encounter the passport as a source of information, not as an obligation. And this concerns specifically the absence of a passport; other rules on mattresses, such as fire safety or chemical substances, are separate from this and remain fully applicable, with or without a product passport.
The date is not yet fixed
There is no definitive date yet on which a product passport for mattresses will become mandatory. The Commission's work plan for the ESPR (2025–2030) lists mattresses as a product group for which a delegated act is being prepared, with an expectation around 2028, but this is a schedule, not a fixed date. Only after that delegated act is published will it be clear from which date the obligation takes effect, and usually a transition period applies before the obligation actually takes effect. Until that text is published, nothing changes in the legal situation: there is no obligation, and therefore no sanction for the absence of a passport. Once the text is published, the date will be stated here.
What this means for preparation
For those already working on this topic, the most practical sequence is: first find out which data about a mattress are already known within the organisation (materials, origin, composition, any certifications), because these are the building blocks from which a passport will be compiled later. Next, it is useful to follow when the delegated act for mattresses is published, because only then will it become clear which data are mandatory and within which timeframe. Finally, it is important to know that deliberately modifying a product in the meantime to come within future requirements, or weakening performance to comply with stricter rules, is separately addressed in Article 40 of the ESPR, which aims to prevent circumvention and deliberate degradation of performance. That article is not directed at those who simply do not yet have a passport because the obligation does not yet exist, but at behaviour that actively attempts to evade future obligations. Those developing or redesigning a mattress now are therefore well advised to do so simply on the basis of current requirements, without anticipating circumvention constructions.
The basis: market surveillance regulation and Article 40 ESPR
The starting point that there is currently no sanction follows from the systematics of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) itself: the regulation works with delegated acts to be established per product group, and without such an act for mattresses there is no concrete obligation to build upon. Once that act is in place, its enforcement is embedded in the broader framework of the market surveillance regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1020), which gives market surveillance authorities in the EU Member States the competence to check whether products comply with the applicable requirements and to take action against products that do not. Article 40 of the ESPR adds to this with a specific provision against circumvention: it prevents manufacturers from undermining the operation of future or existing requirements by designing or adapting products so that they fall just outside the scope, or by deliberately worsening performance.
If you want to prepare for this topic now, it is best to start by putting your own product data in order and keeping an eye on the publication of the delegated act for mattresses — the rest of this knowledge base describes what should be included in that data once that moment arrives.
Where this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 (market surveillance and product conformity)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 40 (prevention of circumvention and deterioration of performance)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you concretely must do
What is expected of you
Do not place a product without a passport on the market
As soon as the obligation for mattresses takes effect, a digital product passport must be part of the product as a fixed component of the market surveillance requirements under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means in practice that the usual process — purchasing, labelling, delivery — gets an additional checkpoint. A mattress without a passport is then not simply a mattress with a missing label, but a product that does not meet the conditions to be sold. Those who overlook this usually do not discover it during their own inspection, but during an external inspection.
Ensure that the passport matches the product
It is not just about having a passport, but about a passport that corresponds with what is actually in the product and how it was made. If the composition changes — a different type of foam, a different filling — then in general what must be stated in the passport also changes. Companies that work with multiple suppliers or varying specifications run the greatest risk here: the passport that fitted the first delivery does not automatically fit the next. More information on this is available under report changes in composition.
Know who has what role in the chain
Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR) divides obligations among manufacturer, importer and distributor, and those roles are not always self-evident. A company that purchases mattresses and sells them under its own name is not automatically "merely a seller" — it could well be the party that is designated as the manufacturer. Those who do not clarify this beforehand discover it only when something goes wrong and the question is asked who is responsible for what. See more on this am I an importer or manufacturer according to the ESPR? and, for those who sell under their own brand, selling under your own brand.
No circumvention or degradation of performance
Article 40 of the ESPR is aimed at preventing circumvention and practices that make a product's performance look better on paper than in reality. For a mattress manufacturer, this means that test results, material specifications and the data in the passport must be aligned with each other — even if a production change is implemented under time pressure. This is not something you arrange once and then leave alone; it is an ongoing point of attention with every product adjustment.
Where things go wrong in practice
The passport is seen as a final step, not as part of the process. A manufacturer arranges production and sales first, and thinks about the passport afterwards — with the result that data is missing or no longer matches the final composition.
A change in filling or foam is not reported. The supplier adjusts a formulation to save costs or because a raw material is unavailable, and no one feeds this back to the passport that was already published.
Unclear responsibility in private label. A retail chain has mattresses produced under its own brand name and assumes the factory will arrange the passport, while the factory assumes the brand owner will do so. See more on this who is responsible for the passport if I have mattresses made under my own brand.
Import from outside the EU without arrangements for the passport. An importer purchases mattresses from a manufacturer outside the EU and discovers too late that there is no party supplying or maintaining the passport data. This is particularly an issue for smaller importers encountering this obligation for the first time; see my manufacturer is outside the European Union — who arranges the product passport then?.
Sale via a marketplace without clarity on the data carrier. A mattress is offered via an online platform, but the QR code or link to the passport is missing from the product listing, while the obligation rests on the product itself.
What you can record
- An overview of your own role per product line — manufacturer, importer or distributor — with a brief explanation of why that role has been assigned in that way. Useful in case of doubt; see who is responsible for the product passport of mattresses?
- A fixed moment in the purchasing process how it is checked whether the passport data still match the current product specification, including who verifies this internally.
- Agreements with the manufacturer or supplier about who reports changes in composition and at which stage in the process this occurs.
- A contact point or procedure for distributors and traders who resell mattresses, so they know what is expected of them if a question arises about the passport. See what obligations does a distributor or trader of mattresses have?
- A file per mattress model with the underlying data (material specification, test results, origin of raw materials) so that the content of the passport can be traced back to a source, rather than the passport standing alone.
- A documented agreement on liability for incorrect data between manufacturer, importer and seller, so that it is not only when an error is discovered that it is determined who is responsible for what. See who is liable if there is incorrect information in the product passport of a mattress
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.