How do I document the supply of passport data in my purchasing contract?
Specify who supplies which passport data, and when
You establish the supply of passport data by describing in your purchase contract which party supplies which data, in what form, and from which moment that obligation takes effect. This aligns with the structure of the ESPR: a market operator that is part of the supply chain must provide correct and complete information to the party further down the chain that compiles the digital product passport (Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). In practice, for a mattress manufacturer or importer, this means that your own suppliers — of foam, textiles, springs, adhesives and coatings — must supply the basic data on materials and origin. A purchase contract is where this supply becomes practical and enforceable: not as a loose promise, but as a contractual obligation with a form, a moment and a responsible party.
For suppliers and importers, not for the structure of the passport itself
These agreements concern the relationship between a purchasing party and the supplier, manufacturer or importer who provides the source data. They do not concern how the passport looks in terms of content, which data format is mandatory, or which fields exactly are mandatory — that is determined per product group in a delegated act and is the responsibility of the platform that compiles and hosts the passport. This distinction is relevant: a purchase contract regulates the supply of data between commercial parties, while the statutory content of the passport is a separate layer. It is also important that the obligation under Article 38 applies to actors in the supply chain in general, while Article 29 specifically applies to importers: they must, among other things, verify that the manufacturer has drawn up the passport and keep and make available documentation. For a party that imports itself, it is therefore important to make explicit in the purchase contract with the foreign manufacturer who bears which part of that obligation.
No fixed date, but a fixed framework
When these obligations will concretely apply to mattresses is not yet established. The ESPR itself is in force, but the obligation to actually maintain a digital product passport for a specific product group such as mattresses arises only with a delegated act for that product group. According to the ESPR work plan for the period 2025-2030, that delegated act for mattresses is expected in 2028, but this is a schedule and not a confirmed date. Once the act is published, the exact date will be stated here. Until then, it is established that the obligation for actors in the supply chain to provide correct information (Article 38) and the obligations for importers (Article 29) are already included in the regulation — so it is not a new system to be invented, but a framework for which the entry date for mattresses still needs to be established.
How to approach this contractually
The order in which this is typically addressed starts with mapping your own supply chain: which supplier delivers which material or component, and which of them has the data that will be needed for the passport (material composition, origin, substances of concern if any). Next, the purchase contract describes which data will be delivered, in what format or via which system, and at what point in time — for example with each delivery, upon change of a recipe, or upon first request. After that, it is customary to establish who is responsible for the accuracy of the supplied data and who ensures the update when a composition changes, because a passport that is not updated loses its value. A fourth point is the allocation of liability in case of incorrect or missing data: what happens if a supplier does not deliver data, delivers it late or incorrectly, and who bears the consequences towards the end user or the competent authority. Finally, for importers it is relevant to include in the contract with the manufacturer an agreement on storage and availability, since the importer itself is required to keep documentation and to make it available upon request (Article 29) — that obligation is easier to comply with if the underlying data has already been contractually required from the manufacturer.
Based on: Article 38 and Article 29 of the ESPR
The obligation to provide correct and complete information to the next party in the chain follows from Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, which sets requirements for actors in the supply chain. The additional obligations for importers — including checking and keeping documentation — follow from Article 29 of the same regulation. Together, both articles form the legal basis why these agreements belong in a purchase contract: the regulation places the obligation on the market actors themselves, and the contract is the instrument by which that obligation is made practical between commercial parties.
If you already work with suppliers, you can map your own supply chain now and include a section on data delivery in the next contract review along the points mentioned above — so you do not have to catch up under time pressure once the delegated act for mattresses has been published.
Where this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 29 (obligations of importers)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you concretely must do
What is expected of you
Anyone who purchases mattresses from a manufacturer or importer and must themselves compile a passport for them is dependent on the data that the supplier provides. The ESPR therefore places a role not only with the manufacturer, but with all actors in the supply chain when it comes to making information available.
Actors in the supply chain provide information
Article 38 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) states that actors in the supply chain make available the information necessary to comply with the requirements of the regulation. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this practically means that a foam supplier, a spring manufacturer or an upholsterer cannot simply remain silent when asked about composition, origin or material data. It does not provide a ready-made list of what exactly must be delivered — that follows from the delegated act per product group — but it does establish the obligation that the information must be provided. Which data this is in practice, you can read in which data you must request from your mattress supplier.
Importers have an additional responsibility
Anyone who brings mattresses or parts thereof from outside the EU receives a separate position via article 29 of the ESPR. An importer enters the chain as the person who places the product on the European market, and with that comes part of the responsibility that would normally lie with the manufacturer. For a mid-sized company that imports mattresses or mattress components, this means that agreements with the foreign supplier about data provision are not non-binding — the importer is answerable if the data is missing or incorrect. What this concretely means when importing from outside the EU is set out in what the product passport means when importing from outside the European Union.
Where things go wrong in practice
In practice, procurement relationships fail at a number of recurring points.
A first situation is the supplier who does supply mattress components but does not routinely send the associated material data. The purchaser often only discovers this when the passport must be compiled, and then supplying it later is often slower than planned.
A second situation is the supplier who provides data but in a form that does not match what the passport needs — for example a product sheet instead of structured data. That takes time to rework and carries a risk of errors.
A third situation arises with mattresses that consist of components from different supply chain partners: the foam core from one, the spring from another. Without a clear agreement about who supplies what, there is a gap between those two suppliers where no one feels responsible. How that comes together in the passport is described in how you combine data from different suppliers of foam and springs in one passport.
A fourth situation is a change of supplier halfway through a product line. The passport of an already sold mattress must remain correct, even if the manufacturer now sources from a different foam supplier. Without documented agreements about archiving of the old data, that information is sometimes lost when the relationship with the old supplier ends.
A fifth situation is the supplier who provides data that turns out to be incorrect upon inspection. Without a contractual agreement about liability and remedy, the question of who puts that right is completely open when things go wrong.
What you can record
A procurement contract can establish a number of things that prevent this kind of situation or in any case make it manageable:
- A delivery obligation for passport data, with a description of which data this is and in which format it is delivered. A starting point for that description is provided in which data you must request from your mattress supplier.
- A moment of delivery, linked to the delivery of the physical product itself, so that data does not need to be requested afterwards separately.
- An agreement on the format, so that data can be transferred directly into the passport without manual editing.
- A liability or correction clause in case data proves to be incorrect later. How you can verify that correctness yourself is set out on how you can check your supplier's data for accuracy.
- A retention agreement for the situation in which the supplier is replaced, so that historical data remains available for passports of mattresses already supplied. This aligns with the question of whether the product passport remains correct if you switch to a different supplier of mattress material.
- A confidentiality agreement, for suppliers who are reluctant to share composition data because they consider it commercially sensitive. An NDA can be a solution here; see whether you can agree with your supplier on a confidentiality agreement regarding the passport data.
- An escalation agreement in case a supplier fails to provide the data despite contractual agreements, with a reference to the steps to be taken afterwards — see what you can do if your supplier does not provide the data.
These points together do not constitute an exhaustive list and are not legal advice, but a practical starting point for discussion with a supplier or your own legal counsel. For companies that are still determining whether their mattresses are subject to these rules at all, that is the question that must be answered first on whether the digital product passport applies to your mattresses.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.